The History of Technology: A Sociological and Global Perspective
- International Academy
- Sep 13
- 6 min read
Author: Ainura Ismailova
Affiliation: Independent Researcher
Abstract
This article explores the history of technology from ancient innovations to the present era of artificial intelligence, tracing the dynamics that shaped human society, economic systems, and cultural identities. The analysis draws on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of capital, world-systems theory, and institutional isomorphism to critically evaluate the role of technology in global development. While traditional historical accounts often focus on linear progress, this study situates technological change within social, political, and cultural structures, offering a holistic interpretation of how inventions emerge, spread, and become institutionalized. Using historical and theoretical analysis, this work identifies patterns that reveal not only the transformative power of technology but also the inequalities and power dynamics embedded in its global diffusion. The findings highlight the interplay between innovation, institutional adaptation, and global interconnectivity, contributing to ongoing debates about the future trajectory of technology in an increasingly interconnected world.
Keywords: Technology, History, Bourdieu, World-Systems Theory, Institutional Isomorphism, Globalization, Innovation
Introduction
The history of technology is often presented as a series of inventions that transformed human life—from the wheel to the printing press, from steam engines to artificial intelligence. Yet, such a linear account risks overlooking the deeper social, cultural, and political forces shaping technological change. Technology does not exist in isolation; it emerges within specific historical contexts, shaped by power relations, cultural capital, institutional norms, and global economic systems.
This article examines the history of technology through three interconnected theoretical lenses. First, Bourdieu’s concept of capital allows us to understand technology as a form of symbolic, cultural, and economic power. Second, world-systems theory situates technological innovation within the global hierarchies of core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral regions, illustrating how industrial revolutions and digital transformations reflect global power asymmetries. Third, institutional isomorphism explains why technological practices and standards converge across nations and institutions, producing a homogenization of technological systems despite cultural diversity.
By integrating these theories with historical analysis, this article seeks to answer three main questions:
How has technology evolved across different historical periods?
What social and institutional forces have shaped technological development?
How do global inequalities influence the diffusion and institutionalization of technology?
The study proceeds by outlining the historical trajectory of technology, followed by theoretical framing, methodological approach, and analysis of key technological transformations.
Background: Theoretical Frameworks
Bourdieu’s Concept of Capital and Technology
Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology offers valuable insights into the cultural and symbolic dimensions of technology. For Bourdieu, capital exists in multiple forms: economic, cultural, social, and symbolic. Technology embodies all these forms simultaneously. For instance, the printing press in the fifteenth century was not only an economic asset but also a cultural revolution, enabling the spread of literacy and scientific knowledge. Similarly, modern artificial intelligence represents both economic capital (in terms of corporate investments) and symbolic capital (signifying technological progress and national prestige).
The adoption of technology also reflects habitus, the internalized dispositions shaping human practices. Societies with traditions of scientific inquiry and industrial innovation often integrate new technologies more rapidly because technological experimentation aligns with cultural expectations and institutional habits.
World-Systems Theory and Technological Hierarchies
World-systems theory, developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, conceptualizes the global economy as divided into core, semi-periphery, and periphery regions. Technological innovation historically emerges in core regions (e.g., Britain during the Industrial Revolution, the United States in the digital age) and gradually diffuses outward. Peripheral regions often remain dependent on imported technologies, reinforcing economic and political inequalities.
For example, the steam engine revolutionized transportation and industry in Europe, enabling imperial expansion into Asia and Africa. Similarly, the digital revolution, originating in North America and parts of East Asia, created new global hierarchies in information technology, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology.
Institutional Isomorphism and Technological Convergence
The concept of institutional isomorphism, introduced by DiMaggio and Powell, explains why organizations and nations adopt similar technological practices over time. There are three main mechanisms:
Coercive isomorphism – driven by political and economic pressures (e.g., countries adopting digital banking regulations to align with international standards).
Mimetic isomorphism – emerging from imitation of successful models (e.g., universities worldwide adopting e-learning platforms after leading institutions pioneered them).
Normative isomorphism – influenced by professional norms and education systems (e.g., global engineering standards shaping technological designs).
This framework helps explain why diverse nations adopt similar technological infrastructures, from telecommunication networks to renewable energy grids, despite differences in culture and governance.
Methodology
This study employs historical-sociological analysis, combining secondary data from historical texts, sociological theories, and contemporary research on technological change. Rather than quantitative metrics, this approach emphasizes qualitative interpretation of historical patterns, institutional transformations, and theoretical insights.
The analysis proceeds in three steps:
Historical Periodization – dividing the history of technology into major phases (ancient, medieval, industrial, digital).
Theoretical Mapping – applying Bourdieu, world-systems, and institutional isomorphism frameworks to each phase.
Comparative Analysis – identifying continuities and discontinuities across time and space.
This methodology ensures both chronological clarity and theoretical depth, allowing a multidimensional understanding of technological change.
Analysis
1. Ancient Innovations: Foundations of Technology
The earliest technologies—stone tools, fire, agriculture—emerged long before written history. The Neolithic Revolution (around 10,000 BCE) marked a turning point as humans shifted from nomadic lifestyles to settled agriculture. Innovations such as the plow and irrigation systems transformed food production, enabling population growth and the rise of urban civilizations.
From Bourdieu’s perspective, these innovations created new forms of economic capital (surplus food) and symbolic capital (monuments, writing systems). World-systems theory helps explain how early technological centers—Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, China—formed interconnected trade networks, diffusing innovations like bronze metallurgy and the wheel across continents.
2. Medieval Technologies: Knowledge and Power
During the medieval period, technological progress intertwined with religious, political, and educational institutions. The invention of the printing press (15th century) revolutionized knowledge dissemination, empowering universities, scientists, and reformers.
Institutional isomorphism becomes visible here: once the printing press proved successful in Germany, it rapidly spread across Europe through mimetic adoption. Simultaneously, core regions consolidated economic and military power through technologies like gunpowder and navigation instruments, facilitating colonial expansion.
3. Industrial Revolution: Mechanization and Capitalism
The Industrial Revolution (18th–19th centuries) transformed economies through mechanization, steam power, and factory production. Britain, as the core region, pioneered technologies that reshaped global trade, labor relations, and urbanization.
From a world-systems perspective, industrial technologies deepened global inequalities: colonies supplied raw materials while core nations industrialized. Bourdieu’s framework reveals how technological capital translated into class distinctions—industrial elites gained economic and symbolic power, while workers faced alienation and exploitation.
4. Twentieth Century: Electrification, Computing, and Globalization
The twentieth century witnessed electrification, automobiles, aviation, nuclear energy, and computing. Technological diffusion accelerated through international institutions, scientific collaborations, and global markets.
Institutional isomorphism explains the global adoption of technologies like television, telecommunication networks, and industrial manufacturing standards, driven by both economic competition and professional norms. The Cold War further spurred technological rivalry, particularly in space exploration and military innovations.
5. Digital Revolution and Artificial Intelligence
Since the late twentieth century, the digital revolution has transformed economies, cultures, and communication systems. The rise of the internet, mobile technologies, and artificial intelligence marks a shift toward information-driven economies.
Bourdieu’s notion of cultural capital is evident in digital literacy: societies with advanced education systems integrate digital technologies more effectively. World-systems theory highlights new hierarchies, with the United States, China, and parts of Europe dominating digital infrastructures while many regions remain dependent on imported technologies.
Findings
Historical Continuities – Technological change consistently reflects power relations, from ancient irrigation empires to digital superpowers.
Institutional Mediation – Universities, states, and corporations shape technological diffusion through education, regulation, and investment.
Global Inequalities – Core regions dominate innovation, while peripheral regions often depend on external technologies, reproducing economic hierarchies.
Convergence and Diversity – Institutional isomorphism drives global technological standardization, yet cultural contexts shape local adaptations.
Future Trajectories – Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and renewable energy may either democratize technological access or deepen global inequalities, depending on governance structures.
Conclusion
The history of technology is neither purely linear nor purely deterministic. It reflects complex interactions between human creativity, institutional structures, and global power systems. By integrating Bourdieu’s concept of capital, world-systems theory, and institutional isomorphism, this article shows that technological progress embodies both opportunities for human development and challenges of inequality, dependence, and cultural homogenization.
As the world enters the era of artificial intelligence and biotechnology, historical insights remind us that technology’s future will depend not only on innovation itself but also on the social, political, and ethical frameworks shaping its development.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Greenwood Press.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System. Academic Press.
Landes, D. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford University Press.
Pacey, A. (1991). The Culture of Technology. MIT Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell.
Comments