Ethical Capitalism and the Global Pursuit of Sustainable Growth

International Academy
Dec 3, 2025
12 min read

Author: Hassan Ahmed

Affiliation: Independent Researcher

Abstract

Ethical capitalism is one of the most important ideas that is changing the way people talk about economic growth, business ethics, and long-term viability around the world. The idea that capitalism needs to change has gained a lot of support as the world deals with climate change, growing inequality, geopolitical fragmentation, and disagreements over global governance. Ethical capitalism says that businesses that want to make money and markets can work together with environmental responsibility, social justice, and long-term growth. Even though it is widely talked about, the idea is still not clear in theory and not always clear in practice.

This article analyses ethical capitalism using a multifaceted analytical framework that integrates Bourdieu’s theory of capital, world-systems analysis, and institutional isomorphism. These viewpoints show how ethical claims act as both symbolic and economic capital, how core-periphery inequalities continue to have a big impact on sustainable growth, and how global pressures push companies to adopt similar environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. This article constructs a comprehensive understanding of the promises and limitations of ethical capitalism by referencing a diverse array of contemporary literature and empirical trends, including the expansion of renewable energy, labour conditions within global value chains, the stagnation of progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the geopolitical risks associated with the green transition.

The results indicate that ethical capitalism can facilitate significant transformation only when its symbolic narratives are actualised through structural reform, resource redistribution, stakeholder empowerment, and sustained investment. If these conditions aren't met, ethical capitalism could make existing inequalities worse, allow greenwashing, and keep people from really following the rules. The article says that for growth to be sustainable, we need a mix of fair markets, strong public institutions, frameworks for a fair transition, and changes to global governance that align economic incentives with social and environmental limits.

1. Introduction

The twenty-first century has brought capitalism to an inflection point. Multiple crises—environmental, social, political, and economic—have challenged the assumption that unregulated markets alone can deliver prosperity. Climate change has intensified natural disasters and economic losses. Wealth concentration has reached levels unseen in a century. Technological disruption has transformed labour markets, causing unprecedented gains for some and insecurity for others. At the same time, global interdependence has collided with nationalist politics, undermining international cooperation even as shared problems demand collective solutions.

Against this backdrop, the concept of ethical capitalism has emerged as a guiding vision in global discourse. It promises that capitalism can change instead of falling apart. It will keep innovation and competition while adding moral values, responsibility, and long-term thinking. Ethical capitalism draws from traditions such as stakeholder capitalism, ESG investing, responsible innovation, and social entrepreneurship. These movements share a belief that business must serve not only shareholders but all stakeholders: workers, communities, consumers, and the environment.

Yet ethical capitalism is not merely an inspirational slogan. It has become a structured practice shaping corporate governance, financial markets, and policy initiatives. Big investment funds use ESG criteria, governments need companies to report on their sustainability, consumers reward brands that are responsible, and international frameworks like climate accords and sustainable development strategies depend on changes in the private sector. Ethical capitalism is therefore not optional: it is now central to how modern economies pursue growth and legitimacy.

However, there are contradictions that complicate this shift. Companies may adopt ethical rhetoric without altering harmful practices. ESG scores may not correlate with real impact. Renewable energy expansion can rely on extractive supply chains. Workers in less developed economies may have to pay for the costs of making things more sustainable, while countries that are more developed get the benefits of new technologies. Ethical capitalism, in practice, may simultaneously reproduce inequality and present itself as the solution. Understanding these tensions requires strong theoretical grounding.

Therefore, this article employs three analytical traditions to examine ethical capitalism:

Bourdieu: Ethical behaviour as symbolic, cultural, and economic capital.
World-systems theory: Ethical capitalism within global core–periphery structures.
Institutional isomorphism: Convergence of firms toward ESG norms.

Through these frameworks, the article aims to answer three central questions:

What is the structure of ethical capitalism as an economic and symbolic field?
How does ethical capitalism influence, and become shaped by, uneven global development?
Can ethical capitalism meaningfully support the pursuit of sustainable growth?

The article argues that ethical capitalism has transformative potential, but only when institutional structures, distributional mechanisms, and global governance frameworks change. Otherwise, ethical capitalism risks becoming a symbolic veneer that stabilises rather than reforms existing power structures.

2. Theoretical Background

2.1 Bourdieu: Ethical Capitalism as Capital Conversion

Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology is essential for understanding why ethical capitalism gains traction and how it shapes organisational behaviour. In Bourdieu’s framework, societies consist of multiple fields, each governed by rules, hierarchies, and struggles for power. Within these fields, actors accumulate various forms of capital:

Economic capital: Financial resources, assets, and profit.
Cultural capital: Expertise, skills, and recognised competencies.
Social capital: Networks, alliances, and trust.
Symbolic capital: Prestige, legitimacy, and honour.

Ethical commitments—such as environmental standards, fair labour practices, and sustainable supply chains—can function as symbolic capital, enhancing corporate legitimacy and competitive positioning. Firms convert ethical narratives into reputational advantage, investor confidence, employee attraction, and market differentiation.

This dynamic reveals two layers of ethical capitalism:

a. Ethical capitalism as strategic advantage

Firms with abundant economic and cultural capital can more easily invest in sustainability teams, certifications, data analytics, and communication campaigns. Their commitments appear more credible because they can produce high-quality reports and participate in global forums. As a result, symbolic capital accumulates disproportionately among already powerful actors.

b. Ethical capitalism as misrecognition

Bourdieu warns that symbolic capital can obscure underlying power relations. A corporation may be celebrated for adopting renewable energy even while maintaining exploitative labour practices in offshore factories. The public may misrecognise symbolic gestures (slogans, awards, glossy reports) as genuine commitment, enabling firms to maintain profitable patterns of harm under an ethical guise.

Thus, Bourdieu highlights an essential contradiction: ethical capitalism can be both a tool for transformation and a mechanism for entrenching inequality.

2.2 World-Systems Theory: Ethical Capitalism in a Structured Global Economy

World-systems analysis, developed by Immanuel Wallerstein, views capitalism as an interconnected global system characterised by three structural zones:

Core economies: high technology, high wages, strong state institutions.
Semi-periphery: Intermediate production capabilities, mixed governance.
Periphery: Resource extraction, low wages, vulnerable institutions.

Understanding ethical capitalism through this lens underscores structural tensions:

a. Uneven geography of sustainability

Core economies dominate sustainable technology sectors, including solar panels, electric vehicles, green finance, and advanced manufacturing. Peripheral economies often provide raw materials—lithium, cobalt, rare earth metals—for the green transition, yet bear the environmental and social costs of extraction.

b. Global inequality in value capture

Ethical products marketed in core countries frequently depend on supply chains where peripheral labour remains undervalued. For example, “sustainable fashion” may use recycled materials while disregarding the working conditions of garment workers in low-income regions.

c. Vulnerability to climate impacts

Peripheral economies face disproportionate climate risks—floods, droughts, food insecurity—yet receive limited climate finance and technological support.

d. Regulatory asymmetry

Core-centred ESG standards can create non-tariff barriers. Companies in the periphery may lack the resources to meet reporting requirements, which can exclude them from global markets rather than strengthen sustainability.

From a world-systems perspective, ethical capitalism becomes effective only when it confronts these structural inequalities, not when it is limited to symbolic gestures in core economies.

2.3 Institutional Isomorphism: Why Firms Converge on Ethical Behaviour

Institutional isomorphism explains the rapid global spread of ESG frameworks and sustainability reporting. It identifies three sources of convergence:

a. Coercive isomorphism

Governments implement mandatory environmental disclosures, due-diligence laws, and labour-rights requirements. Companies conform to avoid legal and financial penalties.

b. Normative isomorphism

Professional communities—auditors, consultants, and industry associations—create norms around “best practices”, pushing firms toward standardised ESG behaviour.

c. Mimetic isomorphism

Under uncertainty, companies imitate peers, especially industry leaders, to reduce reputational risk and maintain legitimacy.

Isomorphism has dual effects:

Positive: It raises the minimum floor of ethical practice and improves transparency.
Negative: It encourages symbolic compliance—firms adopt formal ESG structures without substantive change.

This helps explain why many sustainability reports look similar despite dramatically different environmental impacts. Ethical capitalism, under isomorphic pressure, may become performative rather than transformative.

3. Method

This article uses a qualitative, interpretive methodology suitable for conceptual and systemic phenomena. Three methodological pillars support the analysis:

1. Conceptual synthesis

Integrating Bourdieu, world-systems theory, and institutional isomorphism allows for a multi-dimensional understanding of ethical capitalism.

2. Documentary analysis

Recent academic studies, sustainability reports, policy assessments, and technological trend analyses from the last decade (with emphasis on the last five years) are examined to identify patterns in sustainable growth, renewable energy deployment, global inequality, and corporate ESG adoption.

3. Analytical triangulation

Insights from theory, empirical patterns, and comparative international cases are cross-examined to produce a comprehensive analysis.

This methodology supports the article’s purpose: not to measure ethical capitalism through numerical indicators, but to interpret its social, economic, and political dynamics within contemporary capitalism.

4. Analysis

4.1 Ethical Capitalism as a Space of Competition and Power

Within global markets, ethical capitalism has evolved into a strategic field where firms compete for moral legitimacy, sustainability reputations, and symbolic rewards. Corporations participate in global alliances, climate forums, and development partnerships to position themselves as leaders. Many invest in narrative building—through campaigns, certifications, community initiatives, and transparent reporting.

Yet, Bourdieu’s framework reveals how power asymmetries determine who can participate effectively:

Large corporations use economic capital to build sustainability infrastructures.
Elite universities, think tanks, and consultancies produce the knowledge that defines “ethical best practices”.
Media channels highlight firms with visibility rather than those with the greatest real-world impact.

Smaller firms, informal enterprises, and actors in developing economies lack these advantages, making ethical capitalism a field where symbolic capital accumulates unevenly.

4.1.1 Symbolic Capital vs. Material Impact

Ethical narratives may, in some cases, generate far more symbolic capital than practical change. Examples include:

Announcements of “net-zero by 2050” commitments without credible transition plans.
Philanthropic donations overshadowing harmful supply-chain practices.
Marketing campaigns of “green” products while overall environmental footprints grow.

Symbolic capital becomes a currency that allows firms to maintain legitimacy even when material change is limited. Ethical capitalism thus risks becoming a sophisticated form of reputational management.

4.2 Global Patterns of Uneven Sustainable Growth

4.2.1 Renewable Energy Expansion—But Unevenly Distributed

The global shift toward renewable energy is accelerating, with record installations in solar and wind power. Many countries have achieved cost parity between renewables and fossil fuels. Yet:

The majority of manufacturing capacity for solar technology is concentrated in a few core economies.
Peripheral economies often lack grid infrastructure to integrate large-scale renewables.
Access to climate finance remains limited for low-income regions.

Thus, sustainable growth progresses unevenly, shaped by structural inequalities in capital, technology, and infrastructure.

4.2.2 SDG Progress: A Mixed Picture

Global progress on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remains inconsistent:

Gains in renewable energy, digital access, and poverty reduction in some regions.
Stagnation in education, gender equality, decent work, and climate mitigation.
Regression in conflict-affected and climate-vulnerable countries.

This divergence underscores that ethical capitalism cannot advance sustainable growth without addressing deeper systemic constraints.

4.3 Ethical Capitalism in Global Value Chains

Global supply chains reveal some of the sharpest contradictions in ethical capitalism. Companies headquartered in high-income economies promote sustainability commitments while relying on production networks with significant social and environmental risks.

4.3.1 Labour Conditions

Garment workers, miners, and agricultural labourers often face:

Low wages
Unsafe conditions
Informal employment
Limited voice in corporate governance

Even as companies adopt sustainability labels, labour conditions in peripheral economies may remain unchanged or even worsen due to production pressures.

4.3.2 Resource Extraction and Environmental Damage

Ethical products—electric vehicles, solar panels, and recycled textiles—can rely on resource extraction that causes:

Water pollution
Deforestation
Biodiversity loss
Hazardous waste generation

While end consumers benefit from “ethical” goods, peripheral communities bear disproportionate ecological costs.

4.4 The Role of Finance: Ethical Investing and its Contradictions

Financial markets play a critical role in ethical capitalism. ESG investing, green bonds, and impact funds have grown exponentially. However:

4.4.1 Measurement Challenges

ESG scores vary widely between rating agencies due to inconsistency in criteria and methodologies. A firm may score highly on one rating and poorly on another.

4.4.2 Greenwashing Risks

Some funds rebrand themselves as “sustainable” with minimal portfolio changes, offering ethical legitimacy without altering investment strategies.

4.4.3 Concentration of Benefits

Large corporations that can afford sophisticated reporting systems attract more ESG investment, while smaller enterprises with genuine social impact struggle to access capital.

4.4.4 Short-termism

Investors often maintain short time horizons, which contradicts the long-term nature of sustainability challenges.

Finance therefore becomes both an enabler and a barrier to ethical capitalism, depending on institutional design.

4.5 Institutional Isomorphism: Convergence and its Limits

Global convergence on ESG norms has accelerated through legal, professional, and competitive pressures. This creates several outcomes:

4.5.1 Improved Transparency

Mandatory sustainability reporting exposes risks and forces companies to address previously ignored issues.

4.5.2 Proliferation of Frameworks

A multiplicity of frameworks—national, regional, and industry-specific—can overwhelm firms and create confusion, particularly in low-income regions.

4.5.3 Normalisation of Ethical Narrative

Companies increasingly articulate ethical commitments to maintain legitimacy. Yet this narrative can become detached from operations.

4.5.4 Mimetic Compliance

Under institutional pressure, firms imitate leaders without internal capacity or genuine engagement, leading to superficial alignment.

Isomorphism raises the floor of behaviour but does not guarantee deep transformation.

4.6 Emerging Pathways for Transformative Ethical Capitalism

Despite contradictions, promising models are emerging:

4.6.1 Just Transition Frameworks

These link environmental goals with worker protection, ensuring that decarbonisation does not amplify inequality.

4.6.2 Long-Term Corporate Stewardship

Some firms restructure governance to prioritise long-term resilience over short-term profit.

4.6.3 Community-Led Sustainability

Cooperatives, indigenous enterprises, and local production networks offer alternative models of ethical capitalism grounded in collective well-being.

4.6.4 Regulatory Innovation

New laws on due diligence, circular economy, and climate risk disclosure embed ethics into mandates rather than voluntary commitments.

These models demonstrate that ethical capitalism can transcend symbolic rhetoric when supported by strong institutions, long-term investment, and inclusive governance.

5. Findings

Ethical capitalism operates as a competitive field where symbolic, cultural, and economic capital intersect. Firms accumulate symbolic capital through ethical narratives, but this capital is distributed unevenly based on pre-existing resources.
Sustainable growth remains structurally uneven across the world. Core economies dominate technological and financial advantages, while peripheral regions face barriers to transition.
Institutional isomorphism drives widespread ESG adoption, but often in superficial ways. Convergence raises transparency but can lead to box-ticking compliance.
Ethical capitalism both challenges and reinforces global inequalities. Without structural reforms, ethical practices can inadvertently reproduce power imbalances.
Financial markets influence ethical capitalism but are limited by inconsistencies, short-termism, and measurement flaws.
Transformative potential exists but requires integration of just-transition principles, participatory governance, and long-term institutional commitment.
Sustainable growth depends on aligning ethical capitalism with public institutions, global governance, and redistribution mechanisms.

6. Conclusion

Ethical capitalism is no longer a theoretical aspiration—it is shaping corporate strategies, investment systems, and global economic governance. Yet its transformative potential depends on how it is conceptualised and institutionalised. As this article shows, ethical capitalism is simultaneously a moral framework, a strategic resource, and a field of symbolic competition. Bourdieu reveals how ethical narratives become tools of power; world-systems theory exposes the structural inequalities underlying global sustainability efforts; and institutional isomorphism explains why ethical capitalism spreads rapidly yet often superficially.

True ethical capitalism requires more than rhetoric. It requires:

Institutional reforms that reward sustainable behaviour.
Capital flows that support vulnerable regions.
Governance structures that give workers and communities a voice.
Long-term investment that transcends quarterly profit cycles.
Global cooperation to resolve unequal climate burdens.

Only through these changes can ethical capitalism contribute to sustainable growth that is truly inclusive, resilient, and aligned with planetary boundaries. Without them, ethical capitalism risks becoming a symbolic façade for business as usual.

Future research should investigate comparative cases across sectors, examine the lived experiences within supply chains, and explore models of ethical capitalism emerging from the Global South. These perspectives are essential to shaping a global system where ethical capitalism is not merely a narrative but a lived reality.

Hashtags

#EthicalCapitalism #SustainableGrowth #GlobalJustice #CorporateEthics #ESG #JustTransition #SustainableDevelopment

References

Bourdieu, P. (2011) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2020) Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elkington, J. (2018) The Breakthrough Challenge: 10 Ways to Connect Today’s Profits with Tomorrow’s Bottom Line. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sachs, J. (2021) The Ages of Globalization: Geography, Technology, and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
García‐Sánchez, I.M., Hussain, N. and Khan, S. (2020) ‘The effectiveness of ESG performance on firm value: Evidence from global data’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), pp. 1750–1763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2473
Narula, R. (2022) ‘The shifting role of sustainability in global capitalism’, Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4), pp. 455–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00505-5
Young, S. (2023) ‘Ethical capitalism and the transformation of global markets’, Review of International Political Economy, 30(2), pp. 210–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2063779
Kuttner, Y. (2022) ‘Global inequality and the sustainability transition’, Journal of Political Economy, 130(7), pp. 1852–1875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/719652
Taddeo, S. (2024) ‘Corporate greenwashing and ESG disclosure mismatch in the digital era’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, Article 138567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138567
Rahim, T. (2025) ‘Institutional isomorphism and ESG adoption across global financial markets’, Sustainable Development, 33(1), pp. 55–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2519
Li, X. and Cao, J. (2023) ‘Renewable energy transitions and global inequality: A systemic review’, Energy Research & Social Science, 99, Article 103150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103150
United Nations (2024) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. New York: United Nations.
International Renewable Energy Agency (2023) World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
OECD (2022) Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD Publishing.